PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2020BMC Cardiovascular Disorders9 citationsOpen Access

The minimal informative monitoring interval of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with stable heart failure

ZDZhehao DaiTATaku AsanoOTOsamu Takahashi

Structured PICO

What is the minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP in patients with stable chronic heart failure?

P
Population
368 patients with stable chronic heart failure, admitted due to heart failure and subsequently followed with serial NT-proBNP measurements in a tertiary hospital.
I
Intervention
Serial NT-proBNP measurements (median 6 times)
O
Outcome
Minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP (time when signal of disease progression exceeds noise of biological variability and measurement error)surrogate

The minimal informative monitoring interval for NT-proBNP in stable chronic heart failure is approximately 7.9 months, but should be shortened for patients with higher underlying risk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a potential biomarker for monitoring the status of heart failure. However, the optimal monitoring interval of NT-proBNP is unknown. This study sought to investigate the minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP in patients with stable chronic heart failure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who were admitted due to heart failure and subsequently followed with serial NT-proBNP measurements in a tertiary hospital. We analyzed NT-proBNP measured between six months after discharge and the earliest timepoint of: an alteration of medication regimen, readmission due to worsening of heart failure, or all-cause death. To distinguish progression of the disease from biological variability and measurement error, the signal-to-noise ratio method was applied with a random-effects model. RESULTS: In the 368 patients included, NT-proBNP was measured for a median 6 times. In the random-effects model, signal (progression of disease) exceeded noise (biological variability and measurement error) at 7.9 months (95% confidence interval CI: 5.1-9.6), while noise corresponded to a 61% increase from baseline. In stratified analysis using the AHEAD risk score, the minimal informative monitoring interval shortened as the risk score increased (0-1 point: 12.2 months 95%CI: 10.3-14.4; 2-3 points: 8.0 months 95%CI: 6.8-9.7; 4-5 points: 3.3 months 95%CI: 3.0-3.8). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable chronic heart failure, the minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP measurement was 7.9 months in the current population, which varied with underlying risks. The optimal monitoring interval could be lengthened for patients at lower risks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dai et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ed95553f874f2b222d9e8https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01537-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper