Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, citizens in many countries have been on the receiving end of a wave of interest from governments, NGOs, donors and lenders in ways of involving them more actively in shaping decisions that affect their lives. Innovative experiments in governance have opened up spaces for public involvement in deliberation over policies and a greater degree of control over certain kinds of resources (Fung and Wright 2000, Goetz and Gaventa 2001). Levering open arenas once closed off to citizen voice or public scrutiny, these moves have helped to widen political space for citizens to play more of a part in shaping some of the decisions that affect their lives. Forms of political participation associated with liberal democracy have come to be complemented with a new architecture of democratic practice, built on familiar foundations and offering ambiguous new political opportunities. Whether in budgeting, policy dialogue, planning, project appraisal, poverty assessment, monitoring or evaluation, ‘participatory ’ alternatives to expert-driven processes have gained ground.1 These moves have given rise to new interactions and institutions, blurring old boundaries and creating new configurations of power and resistance. Efforts to involve citizens more directly in processes of governance are inspired, and
Andréa Cornwall (Mon,) studied this question.