Increasing quartiles of baseline CRP strongly predicted future cardiovascular disease (adjusted RR up to 5.6; P for trend < 0.001) but not incident cancer.
Case-Control (n=1,286)
Does baseline C-reactive protein specifically predict future cardiovascular events compared to incident cancer in initially healthy women?
Baseline C-reactive protein is a specific independent predictor of future cardiovascular events rather than a generalized marker for total mortality or cancer risk in healthy women.
Effect estimate: RR 5.6
p-value: p=< 0.001
BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) predicts risk for future cardiovascular events in asymptomatic individuals. However, because CRP also predicts total mortality, its specificity for vascular disease is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of CRP for cancer and cardiovascular disease, the major determinants of mortality. DESIGN: Prospective, nested case-control study. SETTING: The Women's Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study involving 28345 U.S. women 45 years of age and older who were healthy at the time of enrollment. PARTICIPANTS: 643 women who subsequently developed cancer or had cardiovascular events; 643 age- and smoking-matched women who remained free of either disease during 58-month follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline CRP levels. RESULTS: Little evidence showed that increasing quartiles of baseline CRP predicted incident cancer (adjusted relative risks, 1.0, 1.2, 1.1, and 1.3; P for trend > 0.2). In contrast, increasing quartiles of baseline CRP were a strong marker of risk for future cardiovascular disease (adjusted relative risks, 1.0, 2.9, 3.4, and 5.6; P for trend < 0.001). CONCLUSION: C-reactive protein appears to independently predict cardiovascular events but not cancer.
Rifai et al. (Tue,) conducted a case-control in Cardiovascular disease and cancer (n=1,286). Baseline CRP levels vs. Lower quartiles of CRP was evaluated on Incident cancer and future cardiovascular disease (RR 5.6, p=< 0.001). Increasing quartiles of baseline CRP strongly predicted future cardiovascular disease (adjusted RR up to 5.6; P for trend < 0.001) but not incident cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: