PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1998European Respiratory Journal297 citationsOpen Access

Inhaled nitric oxide as a screening agent for safely identifying responders to oral calcium-channel blockers in primary pulmonary hypertension

OSOlivier SitbonMHMarc HumbertJJJ.-L. Jagot

Key Result

Inhaled nitric oxide safely identified responders to oral calcium-channel blockers in primary pulmonary hypertension, with 9 of 10 NO responders also responding to CCBs without complications.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=33)

Structured PICO

Does inhaled nitric oxide safely identify responders to oral calcium-channel blockers in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension?

P
Population
33 consecutive patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH)
I
Intervention
Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) for acute vasodilator testing
C
Comparator
Oral high doses of calcium-channel blockers (CCB) for acute vasodilator testing
O
Outcome
Acute vasodilator response (defined by a fall in both mean pulmonary artery pressure and total pulmonary resistance by >20%)surrogate

Inhaled nitric oxide is a safe and effective screening agent to identify patients with primary pulmonary hypertension who will respond to and tolerate high-dose calcium-channel blockers.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 30.3% vs 27%

Abstract

In a subset of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), high doses of oral calcium-channel blockers (CCB) produce a sustained clinical and haemodynamic improvement. However, significant side-effects have been reported during acute testing with CCB. Therefore, to identify accurately patients who may benefit from long-term CCB therapy, there is a need for a safe, potent and short-acting vasodilator. The aim of this study was to compare the acute response to inhaled nitric oxide (NO) and oral high doses of CCB in 33 consecutive patients with PPH. A significant acute vasodilator response was defined by a fall in both mean pulmonary artery pressure and total pulmonary resistance by >20%. Ten patients responded acutely to NO, nine of whom responded acutely to CCB, without any complications. The 23 other patients failed to respond to NO and CCB. In these nonresponders, nine serious adverse events were observed with CCB (38%). There was no clinical or baseline haemodynamic feature predicting acute vasodilator response. Long-term oral treatment with CCB was restricted to the nine acute responders and a sustained clinical and haemodynamic improvement was observed in only six patients. In primary pulmonary hypertension, the acute response rate to high doses of calcium-channel blockers is low (27%). Serious adverse reactions to high doses of calcium-channel blockers during acute testing are frequently observed in nonresponders. It is concluded that nitric oxide may be used as a screening agent for safely identifying patients with primary pulmonary hypertension who respond acutely to calcium-channel blockers and may benefit from long-term treatment with these agents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sitbon et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Primary pulmonary hypertension (n=33). Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) vs. Oral high doses of calcium-channel blockers (CCB) was evaluated on Acute vasodilator response (fall in mean pulmonary artery pressure and total pulmonary resistance by >20%). Inhaled nitric oxide safely identified responders to oral calcium-channel blockers in primary pulmonary hypertension, with 9 of 10 NO responders also responding to CCBs without complications.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9d0f8594bc049cf93252https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.98.12020265
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper