Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract : A persistent problem in psychological research that reaches conclusions about inaccessible processes or experiences inside a subject's head is to validate those conclusions--that is, to exhibit persuasive reasons to believe that emitted behavior in some sense faithfully reports inaccessible processes. In the mid-1950s, perceptual researchers widely adopted an approach that might be called validation by cupidity. If the experimenter is willing to define a correct response, he can reward the subject for correct responses and not for wrong ones; however, costs and payoffs are rather feeble means of instructing a subject what to do, or of ensuring that he does it.
Winterfeldt et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: