PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2004Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics300 citations

Diagnosing ICD-10 Depressive Episodes: Superior Criterion Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire

View Full Paper
BLBernd LöweKGKerstin GräfeSZStephan Zipfel

Key Result

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) demonstrated significantly superior operating characteristics for diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes compared to the HADS and WBI-5 (p=0.02).

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=501)

Structured PICO

Does the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) improve the diagnosis of ICD-10 depressive episodes compared to HADS and WBI-5 in medical outpatients?

P
Population
501 medical outpatients
I
Intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
C
Comparator
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and WHO Well-Being Index 5 (WBI-5)
O
Outcome
Criterion validity for diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes (determined by International Diagnostic Checklists for ICD-10)patient reported

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) demonstrates superior criterion validity compared to HADS and WBI-5 for diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes in medical outpatients.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.02

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing and monitoring depression in primary care remains an issue of significant public health concern. Clinicians and researchers need to know if any one screening instrument is superior to the others in diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes. This study aimed to examine the criterion validity for diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in comparison with 2 well-established instruments, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the WHO Well-Being Index 5 (WBI-5). METHODS: Five hundred and one medical outpatients completed the questionnaires and had a clinical interview. The presence of a depressive episode was determined with the International Diagnostic Checklists (IDCL) for ICD-10 as the criterion standard. Coefficient kappa (kappa), sensitivities and specificities were calculated and a statistical comparison of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves was performed. RESULTS: Diagnostic agreement between the questionnaires and the IDCL was moderate (kappa=0.34-0.56), with the highest values for the PHQ. While all 3 questionnaires had reasonable sensitivity and specificity, the operating characteristics for the PHQ were significantly superior to both the HADS and the WBI-5 (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Any of the 3 screening instruments can be recommended for clinical use. However, this is the first comparative study to demonstrate the diagnostic advantage of a particular depression-screening instrument using the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria. The superior criterion validity of the PHQ is likely attributable to its closer representation of the current concept of depressive disorders.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Löwe et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in ICD-10 Depressive Episodes (n=501). Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) vs. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and WHO Well-Being Index 5 (WBI-5) was evaluated on Criterion validity for diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes (p=0.02). The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) demonstrated significantly superior operating characteristics for diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes compared to the HADS and WBI-5 (p=0.02).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10b6b3841c44b1306448d9https://doi.org/10.1159/000080393
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper