Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
With a few exceptions DNA probing techniques require the use of radioisotopes and toxic DNA extraction techniques which render the method expensive, potentially hazardous and time-consuming. Most isotopic labeling techniques use the isotope 32P and require 3-10 days to visualize bands after hybridization. An alternative approach is based on the use of non-isotopic detection methods. The available non-isotopic techniques were assessed and their practicality tested. All probes analyzed were tested on samples extracted with a non-toxic extraction procedure using 6 M NaCl as the substitute for phenol and isochloroform. By manipulating probe sizes, blocking agents, selection of membrane and detection system, it is feasible to use non-isotopic labeling and detection in routine parentage testing. Reproducible results were obtained with labeling a variety of DNA probes of various sizes, plasmid and inserts. With an absence of waste disposal costs, probes that are stable for over two years and a staining procedure which takes 3-5 h versus days the technique is well suited for a normal laboratory setting. The next key to the acceptability of DNA testing will be the commercial availability of DNA probes for widespread use.
Dale D. Dykes (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: