A medical-grade wireless monitoring system demonstrated high consistency with ECG Holter for heart rate measurement, showing a bias of 0.04 bpm (95% CI: -7.34 to 7.42).
Observational (n=22)
Does a medical-grade wireless monitoring system accurately measure heart rate compared to ECG Holter in general ward patients?
A newly developed medical-grade wireless monitoring system provides reliable heart rate monitoring consistent with ECG Holter for patients in general wards.
Effect estimate: Bias 0.04 bpm (95% CI -7.34 to 7.42)
Physiological signals can contain abundant personalized information and indicate health status and disease deterioration. However, in current medical practice, clinicians working in the general wards are usually lack of plentiful means and tools to continuously monitor the physiological signals of the inpatients. To address this problem, we here presented a medical-grade wireless monitoring system based on wearable and artificial intelligence technology. The system consists of a multi-sensor wearable device, database servers and user interfaces. It can monitor physiological signals such as electrocardiography and respiration and transmit data wirelessly. We highly integrated the system with the existing hospital information system and explored a set of processes of physiological signal acquisition, storage, analysis, and combination with electronic health records. Multi-scale information extracted from physiological signals and related to the deterioration or abnormality of patients could be shown on the user interfaces, while a variety of reports could be provided daily based on time-series signal processing technology and machine learning to make more information accessible to clinicians. Apart from an initial attempt to implement the system in a realistic clinical environment, we also conducted a preliminary validation of the core processes in the workflow. The heart rate veracity validation of 22 patient volunteers showed that the system had a great consistency with ECG Holter, and bias for heart rate was 0.04 (95% confidence interval: -7.34 to 7.42) beats per minute. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that 98.52% of the points were located between Mean ± 1.96SD. This system has been deployed in the general wards of the Hyperbaric Oxygen Department and Respiratory Medicine Department and has collected more than 1000 cases from the clinic. The whole system will continue to be updated based on clinical feedback. It has been demonstrated that this system can provide reliable physiological monitoring for patients in general wards and has the potential to generate more personalized pathophysiological information related to disease diagnosis and treatment from the continuously monitored physiological data.
Xu et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Inpatients in general wards (n=22). Medical-grade wireless monitoring system vs. ECG Holter was evaluated on Heart rate veracity (Bias 0.04 bpm, 95% CI -7.34 to 7.42). A medical-grade wireless monitoring system demonstrated high consistency with ECG Holter for heart rate measurement, showing a bias of 0.04 bpm (95% CI: -7.34 to 7.42).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: