Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Smart contracts, programs running on blockchain systems, leverage diverse decentralized applications (DApps). Unfortunately, well-known smart contract platforms, Ethereum for example, face serious security problems. Exploits to contracts may cause enormous financial losses, which emphasize the importance of smart contract testing. However, current exploit generation tools have difficulty to solve hard constraints in execution paths and cannot simulate the blockchain behaviors very well. These problems cause a loss of coverage and accuracy of exploit generation. To overcome the problems, we design and implement EthPloit, a smart contract exploit generator based on fuzzing. EthPloit adopts static taint analysis to generate exploit-targeted transaction sequences, a dynamic seed strategy to pass hard constraints and an instrumented Ethereum Virtual Machine to simulate blockchain behaviors. We evaluate EthPloit on 45,308 smart contracts and discovered 554 exploitable contracts. EthPloit automatically generated 644 exploits without any false positive and 306 of them cannot be generated by previous exploit generation tools.
Zhang et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: