PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2020European Journal of Preventive Cardiology23 citations

Non-invasive estimation of stroke volume during exercise from oxygen in heart failure patients

View Full Paper
EAEmanuele AccalaiCVCarlo VignatiESElisabetta Salvioni

Key Result

Oxygen pulse and estimated stroke volume correlated with measured stroke volume at submaximal (R2=0.67) and peak exercise (R2=0.57) in heart failure, but high individual dispersion limits clinical use.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=1,007)

Structured PICO

Does non-invasive estimation of stroke volume from oxygen pulse accurately reflect directly measured stroke volume during exercise in heart failure patients and healthy subjects?

P
Population
1007 subjects, including 500 healthy individuals and 507 heart failure patients
I
Intervention
Non-invasive estimation of stroke volume from oxygen pulse during cardiopulmonary exercise testing
C
Comparator
Direct measurement of stroke volume by the inert gas rebreathing technique
O
Outcome
Agreement and relationship between estimated and measured stroke volume at rest, submaximal, and peak exercisesurrogate

Oxygen pulse can estimate stroke volume for population studies in heart failure, but individual variability requires direct measurement for single-subject clinical decisions.

Limitations

  • Relevant individual data dispersion prevents reliable application to a single subject.
  • Relevant individual data dispersion preventing reliable application to a single subject

Abstract

AIMS: In heart failure, oxygen uptake and cardiac output measurements at peak and during exercise are important in defining heart failure severity and prognosis. Several cardiopulmonary exercise test-derived parameters have been proposed to estimate stroke volume during exercise, including the oxygen pulse (oxygen uptake/heart rate). Data comparing measured stroke volume and the oxygen pulse or stroke volume estimates from the oxygen pulse at different stages of exercise in a sizeable population of healthy individuals and heart failure patients are lacking. METHODS: We analysed 1007 subjects, including 500 healthy and 507 heart failure patients, who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with stroke volume determination by the inert gas rebreathing technique. Stroke volume measurements were made at rest, submaximal (∼50% of exercise) and peak exercise. At each stage of exercise, stroke volume estimates were obtained considering measured haemoglobin at rest, predicted exercise-induced haemoconcentration and peripheral oxygen extraction according to heart failure severity. RESULTS: A strong relationship between oxygen pulse and measured stroke volume was observed in healthy and heart failure subjects at submaximal (R2 = 0.6437 and R2 = 0.6723, respectively), and peak exercise (R2 = 0.6614 and R2 = 0.5662) but not at rest. In healthy and heart failure subjects, agreement between estimated and measured stroke volume was observed at submaximal (-3 ± 37 and -11 ± 72 ml, respectively) and peak exercise (1 ± 31 and 6 ± 29 ml, respectively) but not at rest. CONCLUSION: In heart failure patients, stroke volume estimation and oxygen pulse during exercise represent stroke volume, albeit with a relevant individual data dispersion so that both can be used for population studies but cannot be reliably applied to a single subject. Accordingly, whenever needed stroke volume must be measured directly.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Accalai et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=1,007). Oxygen pulse and stroke volume estimation vs. Measured stroke volume by inert gas rebreathing was evaluated on Relationship and agreement between estimated and measured stroke volume. Oxygen pulse and estimated stroke volume correlated with measured stroke volume at submaximal (R2=0.67) and peak exercise (R2=0.57) in heart failure, but high individual dispersion limits clinical use.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15574dcb801b7f954e62d9https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487320920755
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper