An automated method for inter-heartbeat interval error detection and correction achieved a 96% agreement rate with human graders and a 0.01% false alarm rate.
Automated method for inter-heartbeat interval (IBI) error detection and correction vs Human graders
Agreement rate with two human graders
Heart rate variability (HRV) is traditionally analyzed while a subject is in a controlled environment, such as at rest in a clinic, where it can be used as a medical indicator. This paper concerns analyzing HRV outside of controlled environments, such as on an actively moving person. We describe automated methods for inter-heartbeat interval (IBI) error detection and correction. We collected 124,998 IBIs from 18 subjects, undergoing a variety of active motions, for use in evaluating our methods. Two human graders manually labeled each IBI, evaluating 10% of the IBIs as having an error, which is a far greater error percentage than has been examined in any previous study. Our automated method had a 96% agreement rate with the two human graders when they themselves agreed, with a 49% rate of matching specific error corrections and a 0.01% false alarm rate.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rand et al. (Tue,) reported a other. Automated method for inter-heartbeat interval (IBI) error detection and correction vs. Human graders was evaluated on Agreement rate with two human graders. An automated method for inter-heartbeat interval error detection and correction achieved a 96% agreement rate with human graders and a 0.01% false alarm rate.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1575ae79ff98d0de4ea96f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2007.893491
Jeromie R. Rand
Adam Hoover
New Castle Historical Society
Stephanie R. Fishel
Clemson University
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Clemson University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...