This article develops and defends the Axiom of Tragedy (A6) within the Axiomatic Theory of Tragic Subjecthood (ATTS). A6 holds that any system which eliminates the tragic dimension of choice loses its capacity to engage with reality. This is not merely a philosophical thesis — it carries direct structural implications for AI governance, algorithmic decision-making, and institutional design. The argument proceeds in four steps. I begin by formally reconstructing A6 within the ATTS framework, showing how it follows from the theory's ontological primitives of loss, irreversibility, and subjecthood. I then identify and analyse three elimination strategies — technocratic optimisation, algorithmic proceduralism, and institutional liability shielding — each of which attempts to expunge the tragic dimension from a decision-making environment. I go on to show how each strategy produces characteristic failure modes: reality detachment, accountability dissolution, and structural tension accumulation. I conclude by formulating governance implications and design constraints for AI systems operating in environments with irreversible consequences. The article's central contribution is a structural explanation of why optimisation and engagement with reality are not the same thing. The attempt to eliminate tragedy does not make a system more perfect; it makes it ontologically blind to the environment in which it operates.
Volodymyr Hlynskyi (Mon,) studied this question.