The “architect analogy” of evidence‐based practice: Reconsidering the role of clinical expertise and clinician experience in evidence‐based health care

The role of expertise in evidence-based medicine (EBM) and practice (EBP) has long been debated. In the early years of the EBP movement, the role of expertise and experience were diminished in clinical decision-making. However, the concepts of EBP are evolving. A more nuanced view of the value of clinician expertise, based on experience and clinical judgement, has emerged. This article proposes that clinical expertise does not belong within the evidence hierarchy's decision-making pyramid as the lowest form of evidence, but rather alongside it, representing a complementary source of knowledge that supports the processes of EBP. An "Architect Analogy of EBP" is proposed as a new model by which to describe this relationship. In this analogy, the clinician's use of expertise is likened to the role of an architect, using evidence as building blocks in the construction of the client's edifice, representing the patients' health and wellbeing. Much as an architect carefully designs the edifice in consultation with the client's needs and preferences, choosing appropriate material (evidence), rejecting faulty material, and ensuring construction stays on course, the clinician must sort through a plethora of sometimes contradictory evidence, evaluate its merits and appropriateness for the patients' unique biopsychosocial circumstances and values, and monitor the effects of interventions on patients' health and wellbeing. The expertise of practitioners, as the architects of EBP, is an important supporting source of knowledge that facilitates the "Five Steps of EBP," informs and facilitates EBP, and supports patient-centred care.