Note-based medication review by community pharmacists resulted in minimal changes in prescribing, no change in quality of life, and higher costs compared to standard practice.
RCT
Yes
Hypertension or angina
Note-based medication review by community pharmacists vs Standard practice
Prescribing indicators, patient outcomes (quality of life, symptom control), and physiological and biochemical markers
Abstract Objective Recent trends in primary care have seen closer working relationships between community pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs) in an attempt to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of prescribing. Community pharmacists are appropriate for a role in the management of prescribed medicines because of their detailed training in pharmacology, therapeutics and pharmaceutics. The aim of this project was to quantify the benefit of a general practice-based, community pharmacist-led, note-based medication review of patients with hypertension or angina. Method Trained community pharmacists (20), attached to Grampian general practices (43), reviewed repeat prescriptions of a random sample of patients taking cardiovascular drugs for the treatment of angina or hypertension, and made recommendations to the GP for changes, where appropriate. The effect of the pharmaceutical intervention was measured in terms of prescribing indicators, patient outcomes (quality of life, symptom control), and physiological and biochemical markers at baseline, 6 and 12 months. A control group was treated following standard practice. An economic evaluation of the interventions was also conducted. Key findings The baseline standard of treatment as measured against guidelines was good. At 12 months, there was a small improvement in prescribing of antiplatelet drugs, but overall changes were minimal. Average overall cost per patient was higher in the intervention group. The quality of life measures showed no change between the groups. Conclusions Improvements in the intervention group were small and less than in other reported studies of pharmacist interventions. The National Health Service (NHS) costs of the intervention group were higher than those of the controls. Note-based medication review by community pharmacists was found to be associated with minimal changes in prescribing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Christine Bond
University of Aberdeen
Alison Fish
Terry Porteous
University of Aberdeen
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
The University of Melbourne
University of Aberdeen
NHS Grampian
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bond et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Hypertension or angina. Note-based medication review by community pharmacists vs. Standard practice was evaluated on Prescribing indicators, patient outcomes (quality of life, symptom control), and physiological and biochemical markers. Note-based medication review by community pharmacists resulted in minimal changes in prescribing, no change in quality of life, and higher costs compared to standard practice.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a181dbb56b3e2ada412eb31 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1211/ijpp.15.1.0007
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: