PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026International Journal of Systematic Theology0 citationsOpen Access

Contrasting Models of Deification: The Technological Anthropology of the AI Age and the Theological Anthropology of Early Christianity

View Full Paper
ABAndrew J. Byers

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the resurgence of ancient ideas of human transformation and the implications of AI on concepts of humanity and divinity.
  • Comparative analysis of contemporary technological anthropology and early Christian theological anthropology
  • Discussion of cultural impacts including media and government agendas
  • Examination of concepts like accelerationism and techno-fatalism
  • Identified the cultural shift in discussing deification beyond theology, now prominent in popular media
  • Highlighted the tension between uncritical technological adoption and early Christian hopeful transformation
  • Proposed early Christian views as a necessary corrective to modern narratives of progress.

Abstract

Abstract Ancient ideas about human transformation and divinization have resurfaced in our cultural moment. Artificial intelligence and biotechnology are raising afresh questions about what it means to be human and divine. The Oxford Handbook of Deification has arrived on the scene as its subject matter has splashed out of theological discourse into the popular imagination. What Christian theology would recognize as deification is now a talking point on podcasts, a central theme in film and television and an agenda item for government cabinet meetings. This essay celebrates the Handbook's publication by comparing the technological anthropology of our day with early Christian theological anthropology. The forces of ‘accelerationism’ and ‘techno‐fatalism’ are pressuring uncritical adoption of technological advancements, shaping how we think of both humanity and divinity. Yet early Christian teaching offers a corrective that is realistic about the ‘human condition’ while remaining hopeful of a transformation enacted by the transcendent powers beyond the self, and outside the timeline of modernity's narrative of ‘progress’.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrew J. Byers (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a818e0307b78509433784https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.70027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper