Does emergent surgery increase hospital costs and mortality compared to elective surgery in patients undergoing AAA repair, CABG, or colon resection?
Emergent surgery for AAA repair, CABG, and colon resection is associated with significantly higher hospital costs and mortality compared to elective surgery, highlighting the economic and clinical value of preventing emergency procedures.
In Brief Objective: To determine hospital costs and the adjusted risk of death associated with emergent versus elective surgery. Background: Emergency surgery has a higher cost and worse outcomes compared with elective surgery. However, no national estimates of the excess burden of emergency surgery exist. Methods: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2001 to 2010 were analyzed. Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass graft, or colon resection for neoplasm were included. Using generalized linear models with propensity scores, cost differences for emergent versus elective admission were calculated for each procedure. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate the adjusted odds of mortality comparing elective and emergent cases. Discharge-level weights were applied to analyses. Results: A total of 621, 925 patients, representing a weighted population of 3, 057, 443, were included. The adjusted mean cost difference for emergent versus elective care was 8741. 22 (30% increase) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, 5309. 78 (17% increase) for coronary artery bypass graft, and 7813. 53 (53% increase) for colon resection. If 10% of the weighted estimates of emergency procedures had been performed electively, the cost benefit would have been nearly 1 billion, at 996, 169, 160 (95% confidence interval CI, 985, 505, 565–1, 006, 834, 104). Elective surgery patients had significantly lower adjusted odds of mortality for all procedures. Conclusions: Even a modest reduction in the proportion of emergent procedures for 3 conditions is estimated to save nearly 1 billion over 10 years. Preventing emergency surgery through improved care coordination and screening offers a tremendous opportunity to save lives and decrease costs. On the basis of a decade of nationally representative data, cost differences for emergent versus elective surgery were 8741. 22 (30% increase) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, 5309. 78 (17% increase) for coronary artery bypass graft, and 7813. 53 (53% increase) for colectomy. If 10% of these emergency procedures were performed electively, the cost difference would be nearly 1 billion (USD).
Haider et al. (Tue,) studied this question.