PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1998Policy Studies Journal9 citations

Choosing Not to Choose in Comparative Policy Research Design: The Case of the Research Network on Gender, Politics, and the State

View Full Paper
AMAmy G. MuzurJPJanine A. Parry

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This research note presents the research design for an in ‐progress comparative study on women's policy offices being conducted by the Research Network on Gender. Politics. and the State. The goal of this article is to examine how this project has been integrating a combined approach into its core research design. It argues that rather than conceptualizing the research design enterprise in terms of a zero‐sum game, where a decision to use either quantitative or qualitative methodology compromises potential research findings, researchers may want to combine the strength of each approach in a single project.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muzur et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ba601947c651ddaac202chttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01908.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Policy Paradox and Political Reason. By Deborah A. Stone. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Little, Brown, 1988. 316p. $10.50 paper.1989 · 942 citations
  2. 2Democracies1984 · 2,158 citations
  3. 3Social Feminism1989 · 65 citations
  4. 4The Concept of Representation1967 · 5,137 citations
  5. 5History and Context in Comparative Public Policy1992 · 47 citations