Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The value of multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) in routine cardiology practice is uncertain. We examined the applicability of MDCT imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease in a routine clinical setting. METHODS: MDCT scanning (40 slice) was performed in 111 unselected patients referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and findings were compared to an independent quantitative assessment of the ICA on a segmental, vessel and patient basis. RESULTS: Sensitivity and positive predictive value for segmental disease (72.2 and 70.9% respectively, overall) were higher in patients aged > or = 60 years and history of disease > or = 1 year, whereas specificity and negative predictive value were high in all groups. In the patient-based analysis, sensitivity and positive predictive value (84.7 and 87.8%, respectively) were higher, the latter in keeping with the high-patient prevalence of disease, but specificity and negative predictive value (61.5 and 55.2%) were low. CONCLUSIONS: Usefulness of MDCT was significantly influenced by age, duration of coronary artery disease and female gender, and on a patient-based analysis its diagnostic accuracy was not sufficient to replace ICA in a routine clinical setting.
Halon et al. (Tue,) studied this question.