Can echocardiography and phonocardiography identify severe mitral paraprosthetic regurgitation in symptomatic patients after mitral valve replacement?
Echocardiography and phonocardiography can help identify severe mitral paraprosthetic regurgitation, potentially avoiding the need for cardiac catheterization in ill patients.
Twenty-three patients who were symptomatic after mitral valve replacement, and in whom mitral parapros- thetic regurgitation was a possible cause of deterioration, were investigated by cardiac catheterization, phonocardiography, and echocardiography. Severe paraprosthetic regurgitation was present in ii patients and slight regurgitation in 2 patients. Two patients had aortic regurgitation which was responsible for their symptoms and the remaining 9 patients had either poor left ventricular function, an obstructed mitral prosthesis, or an obstructed tricuspid prosthesis. The various groups could not be identified on clinical, radiological, or electro- cardiographic features, but severe paraprosthetic regurgitation was associated with a reduced A2-OC interval on phonocardiography and normal septal movement with a large stroke volume on echocardiography. In view of the difficulties in clinical diagnosis, the value ofphonocardiography and echocardiography has been empha- sized, particularly in ill patients in whom, on the basis of these investigations, cardiac catheterization may be avoided.
Miller et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: