PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 19, 199696 citationsOpen Access

Applying Winnow to Context-Sensitive Spelling Correction

AGAndrew R. GoldingDRDan Roth

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Multiplicative weight-updating algorithms such as Winnow have been studied extensively in the COLT literature, but only recently have people started to use them in applications. In this paper, we apply a Winnow-based algorithm to a task in natural language: context-sensitive spelling correction. This is the task of fixing spelling errors that happen to result in valid words, such as substituting to\/ for too, casual\/ for causal, and so on. Previous approaches to this problem have been statistics-based; we compare Winnow to one of the more successful such approaches, which uses Bayesian classifiers. We find that: (1) ~When the standard (heavily-pruned) set of features is used to describe problem instances, Winnow performs comparably to the Bayesian method; (2) ~When the full (unpruned) set of features is used, Winnow is able to exploit the new features and convincingly outperform Bayes; and (3) ~When a test set is encountered that is dissimilar to the training set, Winnow is better than Bayes at adapting to the unfamiliar test set, using a strategy we will present for combining learning on the training set with unsupervised learning on the (noisy) test set.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Golding et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d412f1e7099f69105244ahttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9607024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper