PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2006Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare139 citationsOpen Access

A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure

AMAndrés Martínez-FernándezEEEstrella EverssJRJosé Luis Rojo‐Álvarez

Structured PICO

Does home monitoring improve clinical outcomes, patient health, and feasibility in patients with heart failure?

P
Population
Heart failure (HF) patients (42 studies included)
I
Intervention
Home monitoring
O
Outcome
Feasibility (technical and institutional) and impact (on the clinical process, on patient health, on accessibility and acceptability of the health system, and on the economy)

Home monitoring for heart failure patients is feasible, acceptable, and improves clinical outcomes including mortality, hospital readmissions, and quality of life.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the literature for assessing the value of home monitoring for heart failure (HF) patients. The abstracts of 383 articles were read. We excluded those in which either no home monitoring was done or only the technical aspects of the telemedicine application were described. Forty-two studies met the selection criteria. We classified the results into feasibility (technical and institutional) and impact (on the clinical process, on patient health, on accessibility and acceptability of the health system, and on the economy). Evaluating the articles showed that home monitoring in HF patients is viable, given that: (1) it appears to be technically effective for following the patient remotely; (2) it appears to be easy to use, and it is widely accepted by patients and health professionals; and (3) it appears to be economically viable. Furthermore, home monitoring of HF patients has been shown to have a positive impact on: (1) the clinical process, supported by a significant improvement of patient follow-up by adjustment of treatment, diet or behaviour, as well as hospital readmissions and emergency visits reduction; (2) the patient's health, supported by a relevant improvement in quality of life, a reduction of days in hospital, and a decrease in mortality; and (3) costs resulting from the use of health resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martínez-Fernández et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d4a2843708a372d5e03dbhttps://doi.org/10.1258/135763306777889109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper