PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 28, 2013Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences383 citationsOpen Access

Regulatory flexibility in the Nrf2-mediated stress response is conferred by conformational cycling of the Keap1-Nrf2 protein complex

View Full Paper
LBLiam BairdDLDavid LlèresSSSam Swift

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The transcription factor NF-E2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a master regulator of cytoprotective genes, is controlled by dimeric Kelch-like ECH associated protein 1 (Keap1), a substrate adaptor protein for Cullin3/RING-box protein 1 ubiquitin ligase, which normally targets Nrf2 for ubiquitination and degradation but loses this ability in response to electrophiles and oxidants (inducers). By using recombinant proteins and populations of cells, some of the general features of the regulation of Nrf2 by Keap1 have been outlined. However, how the two proteins interact at a single-cell level is presently unknown. We now report the development of a quantitative Förster resonance energy transfer-based system using multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and its application for investigating the interaction between Nrf2 and Keap1 in single live cells. By using this approach, we found that under homeostatic conditions, the interaction between Keap1 and Nrf2 follows a cycle in which the complex sequentially adopts two distinct conformations: "open," in which Nrf2 interacts with a single molecule of Keap1, followed by "closed," in which Nrf2 binds to both members of the Keap1 dimer. Inducers disrupt this cycle by causing accumulation of the complex in the closed conformation without release of Nrf2. As a consequence, free Keap1 is not regenerated, and newly synthesized Nrf2 is stabilized. On the basis of these findings, we propose a model we have named the "cyclic sequential attachment and regeneration model of Keap1-mediated degradation of Nrf2." This previously unanticipated dynamism allows rapid transcriptional responses to environmental changes and can accommodate multiple modes of regulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Baird et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1db364d05d711dc54daaf0https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305687110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Select Heterozygous Keap1 Mutations Have a Dominant-Negative Effect on Wild-Type Keap1 In Vivo2010 · 54 citations
  2. 2Inhibition of the 26S Proteasome Induces Expression of GLCLC, the Catalytic Subunit for γ-Glutamylcysteine Synthetase2000 · 49 citations
  3. 3Design of the linkers which effectively separate domains of a bifunctional fusion protein2001 · 781 citations
  4. 4Abbott boosts investment in NRF2 activators for reducing oxidative stress2012 · 71 citations
  5. 5Global mapping of binding sites for Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network analysis2010 · 794 citations