The MINOCA-BAT trial will randomize 3500 patients to evaluate whether beta blockers and ACEI/ARB reduce death, AMI readmission, stroke, or heart failure in MINOCA patients over a mean of 4 years.
RCT (n=3,500)
Open-label
2:2 factorial
Yes
Does oral beta blockade and/or ACEI/ARB reduce the composite of death, AMI readmission, ischemic stroke, or heart failure in patients discharged after MINOCA without clinical signs of heart failure and LVEF ≥40%?
This paper describes the rationale and design of the MINOCA-BAT trial, which aims to evaluate the efficacy of beta blockers and ACEI/ARBs for secondary prevention in patients with MINOCA.
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is common and occurs in 6-8% of all patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This paper describes the rationale behind the trial 'Randomized Evaluation of Beta Blocker and ACE-Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Treatment (ACEI/ARB) of MINOCA patients' (MINOCA-BAT) and the need to improve the secondary preventive treatment of MINOCA patients. METHODS: MINOCA-BAT is a registry-based, randomized, parallel, open-label, multicenter trial with 2:2 factorial design. The primary aim is to determine whether oral beta blockade compared with no oral beta blockade, and ACEI/ARB compared with no ACEI/ARB, reduce the composite endpoint of death of any cause, readmission because of AMI, ischemic stroke or heart failure in patients discharged after MINOCA without clinical signs of heart failure and with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. A total of 3500 patients will be randomized into four groups; e.g. ACEI/ARB and beta blocker, beta blocker only, ACEI/ARB only and neither ACEI/ARB nor beta blocker, and followed for a mean of 4 years. SUMMARY: While patients with MINOCA have an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events and death, whether conventional secondary preventive therapies are beneficial has not been assessed in randomized trials. There is a limited basis for guideline recommendations in MINOCA. Furthermore, studies of routine clinical practice suggest that use of secondary prevention therapies in MINOCA varies considerably. Thus results from this trial may influence future treatment strategies and guidelines specific to MINOCA patients.
Nordenskjöld et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) (n=3,500). Beta blocker and ACEI/ARB vs. No beta blocker and no ACEI/ARB was evaluated on Composite of death of any cause, readmission because of AMI, ischemic stroke or heart failure. The MINOCA-BAT trial will randomize 3500 patients to evaluate whether beta blockers and ACEI/ARB reduce death, AMI readmission, stroke, or heart failure in MINOCA patients over a mean of 4 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: