PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2009European Heart Journal58 citationsOpen Access

Distinct myocardial effects of beta-blocker therapy in heart failure with normal and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

View Full Paper
NHNazha HamdaniWPWalter J. PaulusLHLoek van Heerebeek

Key Result

Beta-blocker therapy was associated with shared myocardial effects in HFNEF and HFREF, and unique effects like lower collagen volume fraction in HFNEF and lower inhibitory G protein in HFREF.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=71)

Structured PICO

Does beta-blocker therapy have distinct myocardial effects in patients with heart failure with normal versus reduced ejection fraction?

P
Population
71 patients with heart failure (normal or reduced ejection fraction) free of coronary artery disease.
E
Exposure
Beta-blocker therapy
C
Comparator
No beta-blocker therapy
O
Outcome
Myocardial structure (collagen volume fraction, cardiomyocyte diameter), cardiomyocyte function (active force, resting force, calcium sensitivity), and myocardial protein compositionsurrogate

Beta-blocker therapy has distinct myocardial effects in HFNEF compared to HFREF, which may explain the differing clinical outcomes of beta-blockers in these two heart failure phenotypes.

Abstract

AIMS: Left ventricular (LV) myocardial structure and function differ in heart failure (HF) with normal (N) and reduced (R) LV ejection fraction (EF). This difference could underlie an unequal outcome of trials with beta-blockers in heart failure with normal LVEF (HFNEF) and heart failure with reduced LVEF (HFREF) with mixed results observed in HFNEF and positive results in HFREF. To investigate whether beta-blockers have distinct myocardial effects in HFNEF and HFREF, myocardial structure, cardiomyocyte function, and myocardial protein composition were compared in HFNEF and HFREF patients without or with beta-blockers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients, free of coronary artery disease, were divided into beta-(HFNEF) (n = 16), beta+(HFNEF) (n = 16), beta-(HFREF) (n = 17), and beta+(HFREF) (n = 22) groups. Using LV endomyocardial biopsies, we assessed collagen volume fraction (CVF) and cardiomyocyte diameter (MyD) by histomorphometry, phosphorylation of myofilamentary proteins by ProQ-Diamond phosphostained 1D-gels, and expression of beta-adrenergic signalling and calcium handling proteins by western immunoblotting. Cardiomyocytes were also isolated from the biopsies to measure active force (F(active)), resting force (F(passive)), and calcium sensitivity (pCa(50)). Myocardial effects of beta-blocker therapy were either shared by HFNEF and HFREF, unique to HFNEF or unique to HFREF. Higher F(active), higher pCa(50), lower phosphorylation of troponin I and myosin-binding protein C, and lower beta(2) adrenergic receptor expression were shared. Higher F(passive), lower CVF, lower MyD, and lower expression of stimulatory G protein were unique to HFNEF and lower expression of inhibitory G protein was unique to HFREF. CONCLUSION: Myocardial effects unique to either HFNEF or HFREF could contribute to the dissimilar outcome of beta-blocker therapy in both HF phenotypes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hamdani et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Heart failure with normal and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (n=71). Beta-blocker therapy vs. No beta-blocker therapy was evaluated on Myocardial structure, cardiomyocyte function, and myocardial protein composition. Beta-blocker therapy was associated with shared myocardial effects in HFNEF and HFREF, and unique effects like lower collagen volume fraction in HFNEF and lower inhibitory G protein in HFREF.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ec389e5c5a32e9d9a8cfahttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp189
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper