PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1994British Journal of Pharmacology237 citationsOpen Access

Electrophysiological effects of S 16257, a novel sino‐atrial node modulator, on rabbit and guinea‐pig cardiac preparations: comparison with UL‐FS 49

View Full Paper
CTCatherine ThollonServier (France)CCChristine CambarratServier (France)JVJoël VianFondation pour la Recherche Stratégique

Key Result

S 16257 and UL-FS 49 were equipotent in slowing spontaneous action potential firing, but S 16257 induced significantly less prolongation of myocardial repolarization time.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Rabbit and guinea-pig isolated cardiac preparations used to evaluate the electrophysiological effects of S 16257 compared to UL-FS 49.
I
Intervention
S 16257 (0.1 to 10 microM)
C
Comparator
UL-FS 49 (Zatebradine) (0.1 to 10 microM)
O
Outcome
Rate of spontaneous action potentials (APs) firing, rate of diastolic depolarization, and action potential duration (APD50, APD90)surrogate

S 16257 is a specific bradycardic agent that slows spontaneous action potential firing in the sino-atrial node with less effect on myocardial repolarization time compared to UL-FS 49.

Abstract

S 16257 is a new bradycardic agent. Its electropharmacological profile has been compared to that of the known bradycardic compound UL-FS 49 (Zatebradine). Intracellular recordings of action potentials (APs) were performed with conventional glass microelectrodes. 2. In the rabbit isolated sino-atrial node (SAN) tissue, S 16257 and UL-FS 49 (1 microM, 3 microM and 10 microM) were equipotent in slowing spontaneous APs firing predominantly by decreasing the rate of diastolic depolarization (at 3 microM, -23.8 +/- 3.9% and -27.9 +/- 2.6%, respectively). For the two compounds a maximal effect was obtained at 3 microM. In these preparations, action potential duration at 50% of total repolarization (APD50) was more affected by UL-FS 49 than S 16257 at any concentration tested (at 3 microM, +8.9 +/- 2.9% and +29.1 +/- 3.7% for S 16257 and UL-FS 49, respectively; P < or = 0.01). 3. To estimate the direct effects on AP duration, driven cardiac preparations were exposed to these agents. In guinea-pig papillary muscles, paced at a frequency of 1 Hz, increasing concentrations of S 16257 or UL-FS 49 (0.1 to 10 microM, 30 min exposure for each concentration) slightly prolonged AP repolarization. This prolongation was more marked for UL-FS 49 (at 1 microM, +6.1 +/- 0.6% and +11.2 +/- 1.3% elevation of APD50, for S 16257 and UL-FS 49, respectively). 4. Application of UL-FS 49 (3 microM) to rabbit Purkinje fibres, triggered at a frequency of 0.25 Hz, induced a marked prolongation of APD50 and APD90 (+149.4 +/- 51.2% and +86.0 +/- 15.4%, respectively). S 16257 (3 MicroM) induced only a weak prolongation of AP (+ 14.1 +/- 5.0% and + 14.8 +/- 3.3% for APD50 and APD90, respectively) significantly smaller than in the case of UL-FS 49.5. These results show that S 16257 slows the rate of spontaneous AP firing in isolated SAN mainly by a reduction of the diastolic depolarization of the cells, which suggests an inhibition of the pace-maker current (If). S 16257 and UL-FS 49 are equipotent in their bradycardic effect but S 16257 is more specific as it induces less increase in myocardial repolarization time.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thollon et al. (1994) studied this question. S 16257 vs. UL-FS 49 (Zatebradine) was evaluated on Rate of spontaneous action potential firing and action potential duration (APD50). S 16257 and UL-FS 49 were equipotent in slowing spontaneous action potential firing, but S 16257 induced significantly less prolongation of myocardial repolarization time.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fd5531584203657117da8https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb13025.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper