Alternate-day aspirin reduced the occurrence of first nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to placebo (129 vs 213 cases; p<0.00001), but did not affect the clinical characteristics of the events.
RCT (n=22,071)
double-blind
randomized
Absolute Event Rate: 1.17% vs 1.93%
p-value: p=<0.00001
BACKGROUND: The influence of prophylactic low-dose aspirin on the clinical characteristics of subsequent nonfatal myocardial infarction was examined in the Physicians' Health Study, a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of alternate-day aspirin (325 mg) among 22,071 US male physicians. METHODS AND RESULTS: During 60.2 months of follow-up, 342 incident cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction were confirmed (95.2% of all reports): 129 on aspirin and 213 on placebo (p less than 0.00001). Despite this statistically extreme reduction in occurrence of a first nonfatal infarction attributable to aspirin, there were no significant differences in the size, location, electrocardiographic features, or postinfarction left ventricular ejection fraction between the aspirin and placebo groups. Furthermore, among those undergoing angiography, there were no differences in the distribution or number of coronary vessels obstructed. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that chronic platelet inhibition with alternate-day aspirin therapy reduces the risk of a first myocardial infarction but does not appear to have a significant effect on the clinical characteristics of events that are survived. This finding may result from a direct effect of aspirin or from an aspirin-induced shift in infarction severity. Regardless of mechanism, these clinical observations suggest that treatment decisions for acute infarction patients should be made independently of a history of aspirin use.
Ridker et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in nonfatal myocardial infarction (n=22,071). Alternate-day aspirin vs. placebo was evaluated on incident cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction (p=<0.00001). Alternate-day aspirin reduced the occurrence of first nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to placebo (129 vs 213 cases; p<0.00001), but did not affect the clinical characteristics of the events.