Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Under the dual pressures of heritage conservation and tourism growth, improving inclusive access to cultural tourism opportunities in historic urban areas has become an urgent planning issue under Sustainable Development Goal 11 and the Historic Urban Landscape approach. Taking the central urban area of Suzhou, China, as a case study, this study evaluates time-budgeted walkable accessibility, spatial equity, local mismatch, and accessibility-generating conditions from a 15 min city perspective. An integrated analytical framework was developed by combining kernel density analysis, GIS-based network accessibility modelling, Lorenz–Gini equity assessment, bivariate Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), and XGBoost–SHAP interpretation. The results show that cultural tourism opportunities exhibit a clear core polarisation–peripheral attenuation pattern. Within the 15 min threshold, Gusu District records SACR and AAR values of 80.18% and 95.23%, respectively, indicating a pronounced historic-core accessibility advantage. Accommodation-tier differences do not form a simple monotonic relationship with accessibility, but are shaped by the spatial embedding of different accommodation-market segments within the cultural tourism opportunity field. HL units, namely high-tier accommodation near low accessibility, emerge as priority diagnostic areas of local mismatch, while delayed accessibility beyond 30 min becomes particularly evident among elderly visitors. The SHAP interpretation further indicates that leisure-strolling attractions show a more balanced supply–accommodation structure, whereas commercial–cultural mixed and heritage-core attractions are more strongly supply-led. By linking accessibility measurement, equity assessment, local mismatch diagnosis, and mechanism-based explanation, this study provides an operational basis for zonal and typology-oriented optimisation of cultural tourism accessibility in historic urban areas.
Li et al. (Fri,) studied this question.