An integrative review of six articles found no clear differences in patient experience and satisfaction after undergoing robot-assisted surgery compared to nonrobotic surgery.
Does robot-assisted surgery improve patient experience and satisfaction compared to nonrobotic surgery?
Current literature does not show clear differences in patient experience and satisfaction between robot-assisted and nonrobotic surgery.
Surgical techniques have greatly changed and advanced with the advent of robot-assisted surgery (RAS). Patient outcome measures for RAS generally focus on patient morbidity and mortality, surgical complications, and hospital length of stay; there is limited research on patients' perceptions of RAS. Researchers conducted an integrative literature review of published research on patient experience and satisfaction after undergoing RAS. They searched nine databases and screened 1,263 articles for eligibility, six of which were critically appraised and synthesized into two main themes: patient satisfaction with RAS and the effect of information sharing on patient satisfaction. There was a dearth of qualitative studies exploring patients' perceptions after RAS and it was difficult to determine whether patient satisfaction was specifically related to the procedure modality (ie, robotic) or was influenced by other factors (eg, clinical outcomes). Clear differences between patient experience and satisfaction after undergoing RAS versus nonrobotic surgery are not apparent.
Moloney et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Robot-assisted surgery (n=6). Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) vs. Nonrobotic surgery was evaluated on Patient experience and satisfaction. An integrative review of six articles found no clear differences in patient experience and satisfaction after undergoing robot-assisted surgery compared to nonrobotic surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: