This narrative review describes the pathophysiology of cerebral damage during aortic surgery, analyzes brain protection options including hypothermia and perfusion techniques, and discusses neuromonitoring.
This narrative review summarizes the pathophysiology of cerebral damage during aortic surgery and evaluates current cerebral protection strategies and neuromonitoring techniques.
Complex ascending and aortic arch surgery requires the implementation of different cerebral protection strategies to avoid or limit the probability of intraoperative brain damage during circulatory arrest. The etiology of the damage is multifactorial, involving cerebral embolism, hypoperfusion, hypoxia and inflammatory response. These protective strategies include the use of deep or moderate hypothermia to reduce the cerebral oxygen consumption, allowing the toleration of a variable period of absence of cerebral blood flow, and the use of different cerebral perfusion techniques, both anterograde and retrograde, on top of hypothermia, to avoid any period of intraoperative brain ischemia. In this narrative review, the pathophysiology of cerebral damage during aortic surgery is described. The different options for brain protection, including hypothermia, anterograde or retrograde cerebral perfusion, are also analyzed, with a critical review of the advantages and limitations under a technical point of view. Finally, the current systems of intraoperative brain monitoring are also discussed.
Montisci et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Complex ascending and aortic arch surgery. Cerebral protection strategies and neuromonitoring was evaluated. This narrative review describes the pathophysiology of cerebral damage during aortic surgery, analyzes brain protection options including hypothermia and perfusion techniques, and discusses neuromonitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: