PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2010Thrombosis and Haemostasis131 citations

Comparative efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in preclinical and clinical development

MUMike Ufer

Structured PICO

What are the comparative efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profiles of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in preclinical and clinical development?

P
Population
Orthopaedic patients requiring thromboprophylaxis and preclinical models
I
Intervention
Novel oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban)
C
Comparator
Enoxaparin and warfarin/vitamin K antagonists
O
Outcome
Efficacy (thromboprophylaxis) and safety (bleeding complications)

This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical development of novel oral anticoagulants, highlighting their potential as easier-to-use alternatives to warfarin with varying efficacy and pharmacokinetic profiles.

Abstract

Therapeutic oral anticoagulation is still commonly achieved by administration of warfarin or other vitamin K antagonists that are associated with an untoward pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile leading to a high incidence of bleeding complications or therapeutic failure. Hence, there is an unmet medical need of novel easy-to-use oral anticoagulants with improved efficacy and safety. Recent developments include the identification of non-peptidic small-molecules that selectively inhibit certain serine proteases within the coagulation cascade. Of these, the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban have recently been licensed for thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery mainly in Europe. In addition, the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban is in late-stage clinical development. Each drug is prescribed at fixed doses without the need of anticoagulant monitoring. Phase III trials in orthopaedic patients essentially resulted in non-inferior efficacy of dabigatran and superior efficacy of rivaroxaban over enoxaparin without any marked differences of drug safety, while apixaban data is still controversial. However, alterations of rivaroxaban and apixaban pharmacokinetics upon interactions with inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein may complicate the use of these compounds in daily practice, whereas dabigatran elimination largely depends on renal function. Hence, this review reports PK/PD, efficacy and safety data of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban throughout preclinical and clinical development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mike Ufer (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a217c66153b2036cbf1c35ahttps://doi.org/10.1160/th09-09-0659
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development of oral anticoagulants2007 · 13 citations
  2. 2Role of Orally Available Antagonists of Factor Xa in the Treatment and Prevention of Thromboembolic Disease: Focus on Rivaroxaban2010 · 6 citations
  3. 3Anticoagulation with rivaroxaban: covering a broad spectrum of thromboembolic disease2013 · 2 citations
  4. 4Implementing the new oral anticoagulants into the hospital formulary2012 · 13 citations
  5. 5Advances in oral anticoagulation treatment: the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism2012 · 18 citations