PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1988Journal of Clinical Investigation26 citationsOpen Access

Pre-beta-very low density lipoproteins as precursors of beta-very low density lipoproteins. A model for the pathogenesis of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (type III hyperlipoproteinemia).

DCDavid Chappell

Key Result

Pre-beta-VLDL from normolipidemic and type V hyperlipidemic E3/3 subjects had 90 and 280 times higher affinity for the apo-B,E(LDL) receptor, respectively, compared to pre-beta-VLDL from dysbetalipoproteinemic E2/2 subjects.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=10)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
10 subjects (3 with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia, 2 with type V hyperlipidemia, and 5 normolipidemic controls) aged 25-63 years underwent lipoprotein isolation to study VLDL receptor binding.
E
Exposure
Intravenous heparin administration (100 IU/kg) to induce lipolysis in vivo, and in vitro fibroblast binding assays of isolated lipoprotein fractions.
O
Outcome
Physical, chemical, and receptor binding properties (affinity for the apo-B,E(LDL) receptor) of pre-beta-VLDL and beta-VLDL fractions.surrogate

Pre-beta-VLDL from E2/2 subjects interact poorly with lipoprotein receptors, decreasing their clearance and increasing their conversion to beta-VLDL, providing a mechanistic model for the pathogenesis of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia.

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • In vitro binding assays may not fully reflect in vivo clearance mechanisms
  • Heterogeneity of injected material in previous turnover studies confounds interpretation

Abstract

The physical, chemical, and receptor binding properties of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) fractions from familial dysbetalipoproteinemic (dys-beta) subjects, homozygous for apolipoprotein (apo-) E2 (E2/2 phenotype), and subjects with the E3/3 phenotype were studied to gain insights into the pathogenesis of dysbetalipoproteinemia, a disorder characterized by the presence of beta-VLDL in the plasma. Pre-beta-VLDL from dys-beta subjects were larger (27 vs. 17 x 10(6) D) and more triglyceride rich (68 vs. 43% dry weight) than beta-VLDL. Pre-beta-VLDL predominated in the Sf greater than 100 flotation fraction, whereas beta-VLDL predominated in the Sf 20-60 fraction. Because lipolysis converts large VLDL (Sf greater than 100) in vivo to smaller, more cholesteryl ester-rich VLDL (Sf 20-60), it is likely that pre-beta-VLDL are precursors of beta-VLDL. Although beta-VLDL were not found in type V hyperlipidemic E3/3 subjects, they were induced by intravenous heparinization, suggesting that lipolysis of pre-beta-VLDL in vivo can result in beta-VLDL formation. Similarly, heparinization of a dys-beta subject produced more beta-VLDL, at the expense of pre-beta-VLDL. The pre-beta-VLDL from normolipidemic and type V hyperlipidemic E3/3 subjects, respectively, had 90 and 280 times the affinity for the apo-B,E(LDL) receptor than did the pre-beta-VLDL from dys-beta subjects. Heparin-induced beta-VLDL from type V hyperlipidemic subjects had a sixfold higher binding affinity than did heparin-induced beta-VLDL from dys-beta subjects. These data suggest that pre-beta-VLDL from E2/2 subjects interact poorly with lipoprotein receptors in vivo, decreasing their receptor-mediated clearance and increasing their conversion to beta-VLDL during lipolytic processing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David Chappell (1988) conducted an observational in Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (Type III hyperlipoproteinemia) (n=10). Apolipoprotein E2 homozygosity (familial dysbetalipoproteinemia) vs. Apolipoprotein E3 homozygosity (normolipidemic or type V hyperlipidemic) was evaluated on Receptor binding affinity (EC50) of pre-beta-VLDL to the apo-B,E(LDL) receptor. Pre-beta-VLDL from normolipidemic and type V hyperlipidemic E3/3 subjects had 90 and 280 times higher affinity for the apo-B,E(LDL) receptor, respectively, compared to pre-beta-VLDL from dysbetalipoproteinemic E2/2 subjects.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a219c9af6aa648d3a583348https://doi.org/10.1172/jci113642
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper