How reproducible is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) across multiple days in normotensive volunteers?
ABPM shows excellent reproducibility, but initial readings may be slightly higher due to adaptation, suggesting caution before diagnosing hypertension based on a single initial ABPM.
We tested the reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) by the use of agreement plots. Thirty-two normotensive volunteers underwent ABPM on four separate days (interval 28 days), on the same typical weekday. Sleeping time was restricted to the ABPM nighttime subperiod from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM. Twenty-four-hour average values-both systolic and diastolic-daytime average values, and nighttime average values, as well as standard deviation (SD) values, were analyzed for differences (analysis of variance). Adaptation occurred from the first to the fourth ABPM, ie, average 24 h, daytime, and nighttime values were lower (-1 to -3 mm Hg) during the fourth recording than the first (P < .05 to P < .01). The agreement analysis showed a surprisingly high agreement among the four data sets (ie, differences from +/-2.54 to +/-5.92 mm Hg; +/-2 SD of the distribution). We concluded that reproducibility of ABPM seems excellent, but adaptation may occur, even in normotensive volunteers under research conditions. Caution must be paid before labeling a patient as hypertensive, because initial ABPM may yield higher values than later monitorings.
Natale R. Musso (Fri,) studied this question.