PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2002Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology15 citationsOpen Access

Late QRS Activity in Signal‐Averaged Magnetocardiography, Body Surface Potential Mapping, and Orthogonal ECG in Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia Patients

View Full Paper
PKPetri KorhonenITIlkka TieralaKSK. Simelius

Key Result

High resolution signal-averaged magnetocardiography identified ventricular tachycardia propensity in post-MI patients, with longer low-amplitude QRS end duration in the VT group (59 vs 37 ms; P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=44)

Structured PICO

Do high-resolution signal-averaged analysis of MCG, BSPM, and SA-ECG identify propensity for ventricular tachycardia in patients with remote myocardial infarction and cardiac dysfunction?

P
Population
44 patients with remote myocardial infarction and cardiac dysfunction, comprising 22 with and 22 without ventricular tachycardia.
E
Exposure
High-resolution signal-averaged analysis of magnetocardiography (MCG), body surface potential mapping (BSPM), and orthogonal three-lead ECG (SA-ECG)
C
Comparator
Patients without ventricular tachycardia (control group)
O
Outcome
Time domain analysis parameters describing late electrical activity (QRS duration, root mean square amplitude of the last 40 ms of QRS, and duration of the low-amplitude QRS end)surrogate

High-resolution signal-averaged MCG, BSPM, and SA-ECG can identify post-MI patients prone to ventricular tachycardia, with the combination of MCG and SA-ECG offering complementary diagnostic value.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 59% vs 37%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed electrical activity necessary for re-entrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) is detectable noninvasively with high resolution techniques. We compared high resolution signal-averaged analysis of magnetocardiography (MCG), body surface potential mapping (BSPM), and orthogonal three-lead ECG (SA-ECG) in the identification of patients prone to VT after myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Patients with remote myocardial infarction and cardiac dysfunction were studied, 22 with (VT group) and 22 without VT (control group). MCG with seven channels and BSPM with 63 and SA-ECG with three orthogonal leads were registered. After signal-averaging and highpass filtering, three time domain analysis (TDA) parameters describing late electrical activity were computed: QRS duration (QRSd), root mean square amplitude (RMS) of the last 40 ms of QRS, and the duration of the low-amplitude QRS end (LAS). RESULTS: All parameters by each method were significantly different between the patients' groups. For example, LAS parameter in MCG was 59 (SD 22) ms in the VT group vs. 37 (SD 13) ms in controls (P < 0.001), 77 (SD 22) ms vs. 56 (SD 19) ms in BSPM (P = 0.002), and 60 (SD 24) ms vs. 39 (SD 22) ms in SA-ECG (P = 0.005). The combination of LAS parameter in MCG and SA-ECG resulted in improved performance in comparison to any single parameter with 95% sensitivity and 68% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: All three high resolution methods identified VT propensity among post-MI patients with cardiac dysfunction and between-method differences were small. Information in MCG and SA-ECG may be complementary and their combination could be of value in postinfarction arrhythmia risk assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Korhonen et al. (2002) conducted a case-control in Post-myocardial infarction with cardiac dysfunction (n=44). High resolution signal-averaged analysis of magnetocardiography (MCG), body surface potential mapping (BSPM), and orthogonal three-lead ECG (SA-ECG) vs. Patients without ventricular tachycardia was evaluated on Duration of the low-amplitude QRS end (LAS) in MCG (p=<0.001). High resolution signal-averaged magnetocardiography identified ventricular tachycardia propensity in post-MI patients, with longer low-amplitude QRS end duration in the VT group (59 vs 37 ms; P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23083a49ad601d9cd27321https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474x.2002.tb00190.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Late Fields of the Magnetocardiographic QRS Complex as Indicators of Propensity to Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia after Myocardial Infarction2000 · 43 citations
  2. 2Spectral analysis of 87-lead body surface signal-averaged ECGs in patients with previous anterior myocardial infarction as a marker of ventricular tachycardia.1992 · 8 citations
  3. 3High-resolution and signal-averaged electrocardiography to separate post-myocardial infarction patients with and without ventricular tachycardia1994 · 8 citations
  4. 4Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, and cardiac catheterization.1984 · 230 citations
  5. 5Magnetocardiographic Intra‐QRS Fragmentation Analysis in the Identification of Patients with Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia after Myocardial Infarction2001 · 27 citations