Digital media structure the daily life of adolescents at a historically new intensity. Public debate oscillates between alarmism and trivialisation — both miss the empirical situation. This article develops an evidence-based position. Digital media as such are not the developmental risk; the risk lies in the combination of permanent stimulus availability, algorithmically reinforced attention capture, and the still-immature self-regulation capacity of adolescence. From this follows a societal responsibility perspective — protection not through blanket restriction but through relational accompaniment, structural guard rails, and deliberate design of digital environments.
Björn Paulini (Thu,) studied this question.