PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology104 citations

Differential Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes According to QRS Morphology and QRS Duration

View Full Paper
MDMatthias DupontJRJohn RickardBBBryan Baranowski

Key Result

Echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy was greatest in patients with LBBB and QRS duration ≥150 ms (12 ± 12% change in ejection fraction) compared to other groups (p<0.0001).

Key Points

  • To assess the influence of QRS morphology and duration on the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and clinical outcomes.
  • Retrospective assessment of 496 patients who received CRT between December 2003 and July 2007.
  • Patients stratified into 4 groups based on QRS morphology and duration.
  • Echocardiographic responses and outcome measures were analyzed.
  • Echocardiographic response was greatest in patients with LBBB and QRSd ≥150 ms (12 ± 12%) compared to others (p < 0.0001).
  • The classification of QRS morphology and duration was a significant predictor of change in ejection fraction (p = 0.0003).
  • Long-term survival was better in LBBB patients with QRSd ≥150 ms (p = 0.02), but not significant after adjustment (p = 0.15).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=496)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does QRS morphology and duration predict echocardiographic response and survival in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?

P
Population
496 patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy, retrospectively stratified by baseline QRS morphology and duration to assess echocardiographic and clinical outcomes.
E
Exposure
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
C
Comparator
Comparison across 4 groups based on baseline QRS morphology (LBBB vs non-LBBB) and QRS duration (≥150 ms vs <150 ms)
O
Outcome
Echocardiographic response (change in ejection fraction) and long-term survivalsurrogate

In patients receiving CRT, baseline QRS morphology (presence of LBBB) is a more important determinant of echocardiographic response than QRS duration.

Main Result

p-value: p=< 0.0001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the relative impact of QRS morphology and duration in echocardiographic responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: At least one-third of all patients treated with CRT fail to derive benefit. Patients without left bundle branch block (LBBB) or patients with smaller QRS duration (QRSd) respond less or not at all to CRT. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed baseline characteristics, clinical and echocardiographic response, and outcomes of all patients who received CRT at our institution between December 2003 and July 2007. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to their baseline QRS morphology and QRSd. RESULTS: A total of 496 patients were included in the study; 216 (43.5%) had LBBB and a QRSd ≥150 ms, 85 (17.1%) had LBBB and QRSd <150 ms, 92 (18.5%) had non-LBBB and a QRSd ≥150 ms, and 103 (20.8%) had non-LBBB and QRSd <150 ms. Echocardiographic response (change in ejection fraction) was better in patients with LBBB and QRSd ≥150 ms (12 ± 12%) than in those with LBBB and QRSd <150 ms (8 ± 10%), non-LBBB and QRSd ≥150 ms (5 ± 9%), and non-LBBB and QRSd <150 ms (3 ± 11%) (p < 0.0001). In a multivariate stepwise model with change in ejection fraction as the dependent variable, the presented classification was the most important independent variable (p = 0.0003). Long-term survival was better in LBBB patients with QRSd ≥150 ms (p = 0.02), but this difference was not significant after adjustment for other baseline characteristics (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: QRS morphology is a more important baseline electrocardiographic determinant of CRT response than QRSd.

Expert Takes1 quote

“The key findings of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) non-LBBB, as the baseline ECG morphology before CRT implantation, is much more prevalent in real-world practice than in randomized clinical trials; 2) echocardiographic and clinical response to CRT is determined by baseline QRS morphology in the first place and to a lesser degree by QRSd; 3) event-free survival (from death, heart transplantation, or LVAD) is better in CRT-treated patients with baseline LBBB and QRS ≥150 ms. However, this difference is not significant after adjusting for other baseline characteristics.”

Matthias Dupont, Researcher, Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Instituteauto_pipelineNeutralView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dupont et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=496). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS duration ≥150 ms vs. Other QRS morphology and duration combinations was evaluated on Echocardiographic response (change in ejection fraction) (p=< 0.0001). Echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy was greatest in patients with LBBB and QRS duration ≥150 ms (12 ± 12% change in ejection fraction) compared to other groups (p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a35098c88c76de1cded7268https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.059
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of QRS Morphology and Duration on Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ― Analysis of Japanese Multicenter Registry ―2018 · 14 citations
  2. 2Cardiac resynchroniation therapy for non-LBBB and mid-range QRS: clinical value or questionable benefit?2025
  3. 3QRS Duration Versus Morphology and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy2016 · 20 citations
  4. 4Effect of QRS Duration and Morphology on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcomes in Mild Heart Failure2012 · 315 citations
  5. 5Impact of QRS Complex Duration and Morphology on Left Ventricular Reverse Remodelling and Left Ventricular Function Improvement After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy2017 · 24 citations