This letter responds to Beckmann et al.’s co-design article on improving sexual wellbeing support after prostate cancer. The study offers a timely and patient-centred contribution to survivorship care. Its strengths include mixed-methods evidence synthesis, consumer involvement, and practical recommendations. However, several issues require further attention, including limited partner representation, modest stakeholder diversity, weak implementation detail, and limited discussion of equity across sexuality, culture, rurality, and private care. Future work should test feasibility, cost, and measurable outcomes.
Mukhamad Zulianto (Thu,) studied this question.