This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Borros Arneth’s A Novel Quantum Gravity Approach (2025), published on Zenodo under DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17073870, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Arneth’s proposal for a candidate theory of quantum gravity grounded in entropic projection, Diagram Hilbert Space, and the complex operator , through which mass-energy and charge are interpreted as aspects of a single microscopic structure. The analysis discusses possible convergences with TO regarding emergent spacetime, informational structure, gravity as a derived phenomenon, dark matter, dark energy, black holes, boundary, modal necessity, Inducer Effects, and cosmological objectivation. The article argues that Arneth’s framework offers a fertile physical-mathematical vocabulary for dialogue with TO, especially in its treatment of spacetime and gauge fields as emergent macroscopic constructs. At the same time, it identifies modal tensions concerning the absence of a deduction from the logical Nothing, the non-explicit role of TO’s cosmological Eras, and the distinction between entropy and transcendent information understood in TO as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiation. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Borros Arneth; A Novel Quantum Gravity Approach; quantum gravity; entropic projection; Diagram Hilbert Space; emergent spacetime; emergent gravity; mass-energy; charge; dark matter; dark energy; black holes; modal ontology; Inducer Effects; cosmological objectivation; atomic radiation; transcendent information; philosophy of physics.
Cabannas et al. (Sun,) studied this question.