PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 26, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres0 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic Versus Diabatic Controls on Atmospheric Variability in a Tropical Aquachannel

View Full Paper
HJHyunju JungKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyPKPeter KnippertzKarlsruhe Institute of Technology

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how different model configurations influence atmospheric variability in the tropics.
  • Conducted tropical aquachannel simulations using the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic model with grid spacings of 13 km and 5 km.
  • Utilized different representations of deep and shallow convection in simulations confined between 30°N and 30°S.
  • Analyzed Kelvin wave activity and propagation in relation to varying model setups.
  • The 13-km run with parameterized convection showed Kelvin waves with propagation speeds of 15 to 27 m s−1 and produced a slowly eastward-propagating disturbance resembling the Madden-Julian Oscillation.
  • Other runs exhibited Kelvin waves with a constant propagation speed of 24 m s−1, influenced by quasi-standing waves or slowly drifting waves.
  • Model changes significantly shifted atmospheric variability types between standing and propagating waves, affecting potential interactions with extratropical regions.

Abstract

Abstract Synoptic‐ to planetary‐scale atmospheric variability in the tropics is a potential source of predictability worldwide. However, current weather prediction models struggle to fully capture this variability. Here, we conduct tropical aquachannel simulations using the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic model with horizontal grid spacings of 13 and 5 km, and different representations of deep and shallow convection. The channel is confined between 30°N and 30°S with zonally symmetric sea surface temperatures prescribed. All aquachannel runs exhibit prominent Kelvin wave (KW) activity. The 13‐km run with parameterized deep and shallow convection is characterized by KWs with propagation speeds varying between 15 and 27 m s −1 . Only this run, the background flow of which markedly differs from the others, produces a slowly eastward‐propagating disturbance (SED) that resembles the Madden‐Julian Oscillation with off‐equatorial Rossby gyres. The other aquachannel runs exhibit wavenumber‐one KWs with an almost constant propagation speed of 24 m s −1 superposed on quasi‐standing or slowly drifting waves with much higher zonal wavenumbers. In runs with explicit deep convection, these quasi‐standing waves are primarily controlled by the vertical advection of moist static energy, while in the 5‐km run with parameterized deep and shallow convection, cloud‐radiative effects play a bigger role. The latter are also key to maintaining the SED in the 13‐km run with parameterized deep and shallow convection. This study demonstrates that subtle changes in model configuration can shift the large‐scale atmospheric variability in the tropics between standing and propagating types of waves, which would greatly influence possible interactions with the extratropics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3e17d3030ad1a9b3091291https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd045348
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper