On Shaping reads the master equation of continuous-time stochastic processes — ∂P/∂t = ∫P (X′, t) q (X′→X) − P (X, t) q (X→X′) dX′ — as a picture of reality shaping itself: a flow of all possibility into all possibility whose stationary state (the fixed point where every inflow balances its outflow) is the single shape the churn of perspectives settles toward. It places this flow in correspondence, at the limit, with the author's subjective-experience functional L (t) = ∮M A (Sᵢ, t) · (Σⱼ Sⱼ (t) ) dσ, amplitude A (Sᵢ, t) = α (Sᵢ, t) ·e^iφᵢ (t) ·Sᵢ. The molded correspondence L* ⇔ ∂P/∂t = 0 is read strictly as phase coherence in the physics register, and — in the philosophical register only — suggested as a parallel reading in terms of the coherence of intent. The bidirectionality of phase (constructive or destructive, with no lawful preference) is mirrored against the bidirectionality of intent (alignment toward, or away from, the shared shape) ; the double-arrow is offered as a correspondence, never a command. The essay develops ergodicity as a model of coherence (the aligned trace as the one that stays reachable to all of being) ; distinguishes equilibrium detailed balance from non-equilibrium steady states (the resting mind and the living life as one shape settled two ways) ; reads the astronaut's flat disk as a single projection of a sphere recovered only by integrating viewpoints; and treats the unsettled ambiguities of Luke 17: 21 (ἐντὸς ὑμῶν, "within" vs "among") and Neil Armstrong's "one small step for a man" as two cases in which the inward and collective meanings name a single stationary shape. The mathematics is settled and borrowed; the metaphysics is proposed and owned; the seam between them is kept deliberately visible. Offered as phenomenology and speculative philosophy, naturalist-compatible throughout, not as derived physics.
Jamison Johsnon (2026) studied this question.