Artificial intelligence and machine learning offer potential to improve heart failure diagnosis and treatment, though significant challenges currently limit their real-world clinical implementation.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning hold significant promise for improving heart failure diagnosis and management, but substantial methodological and ethical challenges must be overcome before widespread clinical adoption.
Heart failure (HF) is a complex, multifactorial, and difficult-to-treat syndrome. Over the past years, a concerning increase in its global prevalence, mortality, costs, and burden on the healthcare system has been observed. The recent development of machine learning (ML), especially unsupervised and deep learning (DL) algorithms, offers a potential way to facilitate diagnosis, enable more precise treatment, and reduce both mortality and costs of HF patients. Especially unsupervised ML and DL present new opportunities for increased efficiency in clinical practice in cardiology. Unsupervised ML, e.g., enables novel phenogrouping of HF patients into high-risk groups and disease outcome prediction. Deep learning algorithms can enhance echocardiographic analysis by improving image quality and ECG interpretation, and by providing assistance and guidance to inexperienced cardiologists. However, substantial challenges related to generalizability, external validation, overfitting, model explainability, and ethical considerations currently severely limit the implementation of AI-based tools in real-world clinical practice. This review critically evaluates current AI models in HF, focusing on their roles in diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment personalization, as well as the major challenges that restrict their application in clinical practice.
Resch et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Heart failure. Artificial intelligence (machine learning and deep learning) was evaluated. Artificial intelligence and machine learning offer potential to improve heart failure diagnosis and treatment, though significant challenges currently limit their real-world clinical implementation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: