The escalating insecurity in Nigeria, which is a result of terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, communal conflicts and organised crimes, has heightened national discussions on the establishment of state policing as a viable alternative to the current centralized policing system. Advocates have noted that decentralized policing will enhance community relations and allow for community-based responses to security issues, while opposition has noted potential for political manipulation and abuse of power, lack of funding, and negative impacts on national unity. In this article, the development of state policing in Nigeria is discussed in a qualitative study using the case study approach, and both the psychological and political aspects of the proposed reform are explored. In particular, the study examines the psychological consequences of transitioning to state policing on police officers and communities as it relates to stress, morale, officer autonomy, community trust, legitimacy, and institutional support. It also examines the political factors affecting the reform, such as federal–state relations, constitutional considerations, stakeholder interests, policy negotiation, financing, accountability, and corruption threats. The investigation is based on documentary evidence analysis of constitutional provisions, proposed legislations, judicial authorities, policy documents, government reports and scholarly literature. The article also states some of the indicators of psychological and political successes and failures of state policing reform. It finds that the successful implementation of the recommendations must address constitutional safeguards, strong accountability systems, extensive stakeholder engagement, public sensitisation, additional capacity building for state political leaders, and continued investment in police welfare and institutional capacity. The results of the findings are helping to inform the policy debate and recommendations are provided for an accountable, rights-based and community policing framework that can respond to the security issues facing Nigeria today.
SECURITY et al. (Thu,) studied this question.