PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2015Texas Heart Institute Journal16 citations

Intensive Statin Therapy in NSTE-ACS Patients Undergoing PCI: Clinical and Biochemical Effects

MSMohamed ShehataGFGeorge FayezANAhmed Nassar

Key Result

Intensive atorvastatin therapy in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI significantly lowered hs-CRP levels (P<0.001) and improved LVEF (P<0.05) at 6 months, with no difference in MACE.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=140)

Randomization

randomly assigned

Structured PICO

Does intensive atorvastatin therapy (160-mg loading dose followed by 80-mg daily) improve biochemical outcomes, left ventricular ejection fraction, and reduce major adverse cardiac events compared to a moderate 20-mg daily dose in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI?

P
Population
140 patients (mean age 56, 32% female) with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome scheduled for PCI, followed for 6 months.
I
Intervention
Atorvastatin 160-mg loading dose (given as 80 mg 12 and 2 hours before coronary angiography) followed by an intensified 80-mg daily dose for 6 months.
C
Comparator
Atorvastatin moderate 20-mg daily dose for 6 months.
O
Outcome
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, left ventricular systolic function (LVEF), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6 months.surrogate

Intensive atorvastatin loading and maintenance therapy in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI improves inflammatory markers and left ventricular systolic function at 6 months, though it does not significantly reduce short-term adverse cardiac events.

Limitations

  • Included patients with relatively favorable risk profiles (no prior PCI or CABG and a fair baseline LVEF)
  • Follow-up period was relatively short

Abstract

Early initiation of statin therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients has a favorable prognostic impact because of its anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic properties. In this study, we explored the effect of atorvastatin-loading, followed by intensive atorvastatin therapy, on clinical and biochemical outcomes in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients who were scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention. We prospectively enrolled 140 patients (mean age, 56 ± 9 years, 68% men). Once eligible, patients were randomly assigned to receive either a moderate 20-mg daily dose of atorvastatin (Group A) or a 160-mg loading dose followed by an intensified 80-mg daily dose (Group B). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were recorded before and after intervention. Evaluation after 6 months included hs-CRP levels, left ventricular systolic function, and major adverse cardiac events. We found no significant difference between the 2 groups in regard to the interventional data. However, blood sampling after coronary intervention, and again 6 months later, revealed a significant decline in mean hs-CRP level among Group B patients (P < 0.001). Moreover, patients in Group B manifested a higher left ventricular ejection fraction than did patients in Group A (P < 0.05). After 6 months, we found no significant difference between groups in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. We conclude that intensive atorvastatin therapy in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients is associated with lower hs-CRP levels and with higher left ventricular ejection fraction after 6 months, with no significant impact on adverse cardiac events.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shehata et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (n=140). Atorvastatin vs. moderate 20-mg daily dose of atorvastatin was evaluated on hs-CRP levels, left ventricular systolic function, and major adverse cardiac events. Intensive atorvastatin therapy in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI significantly lowered hs-CRP levels (P<0.001) and improved LVEF (P<0.05) at 6 months, with no difference in MACE.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f578ae36a167817e10d46https://doi.org/10.14503/thij-14-4891
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper