PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2008AJP Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology41 citations

Systemic arterial compliance, systemic vascular resistance, and effective arterial elastance during exercise in endurance-trained men

View Full Paper
TOTakeshi OtsukiSMSeiji MaedaMIMotoyuki Iemitsu

Structured PICO

How do systemic arterial compliance, vascular resistance, and effective arterial elastance change during exercise in endurance-trained versus sedentary men?

P
Population
25 men, comprising 13 endurance-trained (ET) and 12 sedentary control (SC) individuals.
I
Intervention
Exercise at 40%, 60%, and 80% maximal oxygen uptake.
C
Comparator
Resting state and comparison between endurance-trained and sedentary control groups.
O
Outcome
Systemic arterial compliance (C), systemic vascular resistance (R), effective arterial elastance (Ea), and cardiac cycle length (T) measured using Doppler ultrasonography.surrogate

Endurance training enhances the dynamic reduction of systemic arterial compliance during exercise, which may help maintain optimal ventricular-arterial coupling.

Abstract

Systemic arterial compliance (C) and vascular resistance (R) regulate effective arterial elastance (Ea), an index of artery load. Increases in Ea during exercise are due primarily to reductions of C and maintain optimal ventricular-arterial coupling. Because C at rest and left ventricular functional reserve are greater in endurance-trained (ET) compared with sedentary control (SC) humans, we hypothesized that reductions of C and increases in Ea are greater in ET than SC individuals. The aim of this study was to investigate C, R, and Ea during exercise in ET and SC humans. C, R, Ea, and cardiac cycle length (T) were measured at rest and during exercise of 40, 60, and 80% maximal oxygen uptake using Doppler ultrasonography in 12 SC and 13 ET men. C decreased in an exercise intensity-dependent manner in both groups, but its reductions were greater in the ET than SC subjects. Consequently, although C at rest was greater in the ET than SC group, the intergroup difference in C disappeared during exercise. Exercise-related changes in R/T were relatively slight and R/T was lower in the ET than the SC group, both at rest and during exercise. Although Ea at rest was lower in the ET than SC group, there were no intergroup differences in Ea at 40, 60, or 80% maximal oxygen uptake. We conclude that the reductions of C from rest to exercise are more marked in ET than SC humans. This may be related to the exercise-associated disappearance of the difference in Ea between ET and SC humans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Otsuki et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a713a7078a11c550e0b488dhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00009.2008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper