PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2004Journal of Clinical Microbiology78 citationsOpen Access

Amplicon Sequencing and Improved Detection of Human Rhinovirus in Respiratory Samples

CDChristelle DeffernezWWWerner WunderliYTYves Thomas

Structured PICO

P
Population
87 different human rhinovirus (HRV) serotypes and clinical isolates, and 161 bronchoalveolar lavage specimens
I
Intervention
Real-time RT-PCR assay specific for HRV detection designed by sequencing the 5' noncoding regions
C
Comparator
Viral culture
O
Outcome
Detection and discrimination of HRV from other picornaviruses

A newly designed real-time RT-PCR assay targeting the 5' noncoding region improves the specific detection of human rhinovirus in clinical specimens compared to culture.

Abstract

Improved knowledge of the genotypic characteristics of human rhinovirus (HRV) is required, as are nucleic detection assays with the capacity to overcome both the similarities between members of the family Picornaviridae and the wide diversity of different HRV serotypes. The goal of the present study was to investigate the variability and the genotypic diversity of clinical strains circulating in the community. Since most reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assays available cannot differentiate HRV from other members of the family Picornaviridae, we also validated an assay specific for HRV detection. The 5' noncoding regions of 87 different HRV serotypes and clinical isolates were sequenced. On the basis of sequence analysis and phylogenetic determination, we first confirmed that all clinical isolates were HRV. We then validated a real-time RT-PCR assay that was able not only to detect all HRV serotypes and all clinical isolates tested but also to accurately discriminate between rhinovirus and other viruses from the family Picornaviridae. This assay was negative with isolates of coxsackievirus (types A and B), echovirus, enterovirus, parechovirus, and poliovirus, as well as nonpicornaviruses. Among a series of bronchoalveolar lavage specimens, 4% (7 of 161) were positive by culture, whereas 13% (21 of 161) were positive by RT-PCR. In the present study we showed that to specifically identify HRV in clinical specimens, diagnostic assays need to overcome both the diversities and the similarities of picornaviruses. By sequencing the 5' noncoding regions of rhinoviruses recovered from clinical specimens, we designed probes that could specifically detect rhinovirus.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deffernez et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a715ab9660549caf2c5fb4bhttps://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.7.3212-3218.2004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper