Does right versus left sympathetic nerve stimulation differentially affect direct and indirect inotropic effects in isolated canine hearts?
In isolated canine hearts, right sympathetic stimulation increases contractility via both direct and indirect (heart rate-dependent) mechanisms, whereas left sympathetic stimulation acts almost exclusively via direct inotropic effects.
Although sympathetic nerve stimulation is known to increase ventricular contractility, concomitant increases in heart rate (HR) make it difficult to separate its direct inotropic effect from indirect inotropic effect through a force-frequency mechanism. We stimulated the stellate ganglia in 8 isolated canine hearts with functional sympathetic nerves. Right sympathetic stimulation at 10 Hz increased ventricular end-systolic elastance (E(es)) by 95.7 +/- 7.5% (p < 0.001) and HR by 32.5 +/- 4.2% (p < 0.05). In contrast, left sympathetic stimulation at 10 Hz increased E(es) by 70.7 +/- 6.5% (p < 0.001) without significant changes in HR. Preventing the chronotropic response by fixed-rate pacing attenuated the E(es) response to right sympathetic stimulation at 5 Hz (52.0 +/- 5.1 vs. 22.8 +/- 2.8%, p < 0.001), but not to left sympathetic stimulation at 5 Hz (54.5 +/- 3.4 vs. 53.3 +/- 2.2%, NS). In the isolated canine heart, the right sympathetic nerve affected E(es) by both the direct inotropic effect and the indirect HR-dependent inotropic effect. In contrast, the left sympathetic nerve regulated E(es) primarily by its direct inotropic effect.
Nakayama et al. (2001) studied this question.