PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 26, 2026Journal of the Chinese Medical Association0 citations

Risk factors of hepatotoxicity with ribociclib in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

View Full Paper
WLWei-Chi LinYCYu-Li ChangSWSheng‐Fan Wang

Key Points

  • To compare the risk of hepatotoxicity between ribociclib and palbociclib and identify clinical risk factors for liver injury in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
  • Retrospective cohort study of female patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with ribociclib (N=145) or palbociclib (N=153) between January 2018 and June 2022.
  • Graded hepatotoxicity using CTCAE version 5.0 (grade ≥2 as the primary outcome) and analyzed risk factors with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.
  • Hepatotoxicity developed in 28 of 145 patients receiving ribociclib compared with 19 of 153 receiving palbociclib (median onset 42 days in both groups), with palbociclib showing a significantly lower adjusted risk (adjusted HR 0.467, 95% CI 0.233–0.936, p = 0.0320).
  • Independent baseline risk factors for hepatotoxicity across all patients were fatty liver (HR 3.536, 95% CI 1.840–6.794, p = 0.0002), history of HBV infection (HR 2.216, 95% CI 1.102–4.458, p = 0.0256), and liver metastasis (HR 2.159, 95% CI 1.175–3.966, p = 0.0131).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, including palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, combined with endocrine therapy. Hepatobiliary toxicity is an important adverse effect of ribociclib. This study compared the risk of hepatotoxicity between ribociclib and palbociclib and identified factors associated with hepatotoxicity. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving ribociclib or palbociclib between January 1, 2018 and June 1, 2022. Hepatotoxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0, with grade 2 or higher considered as the study outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed time to hepatotoxicity, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model estimated adjusted hazard ratios. RESULTS: The mean age was 61 years, and all patients were women. Among 145 patients receiving ribociclib, 28 developed hepatotoxicity, compared with 19 of 153 patients receiving palbociclib. The median time to hepatotoxicity was 42 days in both groups. After adjustment for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, fatty liver, and liver metastasis, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for palbociclib compared with ribociclib was 0.467 (95% confidence interval CI, 0.233-0.936; p = 0.0320). In the overall population, liver metastasis (HR, 2.159; 95% CI, 1.175-3.966; p = 0.0131), history of HBV infection (HR, 2.216; 95% CI, 1.102-4.458; p = 0.0256), and fatty liver (HR, 3.536; 95% CI, 1.840-6.794; p = 0.0002) were associated with higher risk of hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Compared with palbociclib, ribociclib was associated with a higher risk of hepatotoxicity during the first six months of treatment. Closer monitoring of liver function may be warranted, particularly in patients with liver metastases, a history of HBV infection, or fatty liver who receive ribociclib.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8e9b68451774b83f3b42f8https://doi.org/10.1097/jcma.0000000000001417
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper