This essay brings together the central ontological claims developed across fifteen earlier articles. It argues that reality is identical neither with mere factuality nor with an abstract reserve of bare possibilities. Reality must instead be understood as a structured open process in which actuality emerges from potentiality without ever fully exhausting it. The ontological point of departure thus shifts: in place of a being determined by a hidden principle, there appears an immanent nexus of processual dynamics in which structures take shape as metastable orders.This same basic tension appears dynamically as the relation between structure and openness, or, equivalently, between determinacy and contingency. Processes are ordered and directed without thereby being fully fixed; alternative possibilities remain really operative within the unfolding of events. Contingency is therefore not merely a function of the observer’s ignorance, but an ontological feature of nondeterministic reality.From this follows an epistemological consequence: because reality comprises more than what is presently actual, it can only be adequately described through models. Space-time structures, possibility spaces, attractor landscapes, or comparable formal architectures are indispensable for articulating the inner complexity of real processes. Yet such models, however necessary, are not themselves constituents of reality.On this basis, teleodynamic field ontology interprets meaning, consciousness, and teleology not as secondary additions to an otherwise meaningless world, but as immanent modes in which a relationally structured reality becomes articulable, intelligible, and oriented toward coherence. Reality thus appears neither as rigid being nor as sheer flux, but as recursively organized, structured openness.
Hans-Joachim Rudolph (2026) studied this question.