PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2010European Heart Journal148 citationsOpen Access

Risk score to predict serious bleeding in stable outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis

View Full Paper
GDGrégory DucrocqJWJeannie S. WallaceGBGabriel Baron

Key Result

A nine-item risk score predicted serious bleeding at 2 years in outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis, with observed incidence ranging from 0.46% (score ≤6) to 2.76% (score ≥11).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=56,616)

Structured PICO

Can a clinical risk score predict serious bleeding in stable outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis?

P
Population
56,616 outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis followed for 2 years to develop and validate a bleeding risk score.
E
Exposure
Nine-item bleeding risk score (age, peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, antiplatelets, oral anticoagulants, hypercholesterolaemia)
O
Outcome
Serious bleeding (non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke or bleeding leading to hospitalization and transfusion) over 2 yearssafety

A simple nine-item clinical risk score can effectively predict the 2-year risk of serious bleeding in outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis, aiding in antithrombotic decision-making.

Abstract

AIMS: To develop a risk score to quantify bleeding risk in outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied patients in the REACH Registry, a cohort of 68 236 patients with/at risk of atherothrombosis. The outcome of interest was serious bleeding (non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke or bleeding leading to hospitalization and transfusion) over 2 years. Risk factors for bleeding were assessed using modified regression analysis. Multiple potential scoring systems based on the least complex models were constructed. Competing scores were compared on their discriminative ability via logistic regression. The score was validated externally using the CHARISMA population. From a final cohort of 56 616 patients, 804 (1.42%, 95% confidence interval 1.32-1.52) experienced serious bleeding between baseline and 2 years. A nine-item bleeding risk score (0-23 points) was constructed (age, peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, antiplatelets, oral anticoagulants, hypercholesterolaemia). Observed incidence of bleeding at 2 years was: 0.46% (score or = 11). The score's discriminative performance was consistent in CHARISMA and REACH (c-statistics 0.64 and 0.68, respectively); calibration in the CHARISMA population was very good (modified Hosmer-Lemeshow c(2) = 4.74; P = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Bleeding risk increased substantially with a score >10. This score can assist clinicians in predicting the risk of serious bleeding and making decisions on antithrombotic therapy in outpatients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ducrocq et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in atherothrombosis or at risk of atherothrombosis (n=56,616). Nine-item bleeding risk score was evaluated on serious bleeding (non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke or bleeding leading to hospitalization and transfusion) over 2 years. A nine-item risk score predicted serious bleeding at 2 years in outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis, with observed incidence ranging from 0.46% (score ≤6) to 2.76% (score ≥11).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a947dc3d1e52e04d9139272https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq021
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper