PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 4, 2025OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying0 citations

Death Literacy Index Short Form: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version

View Full Paper
VÇVahide Semerci ÇakmakESEbru Sönmez SarıASAhmet Seven

Key Points

  • The Turkish version of the Death Literacy Index shows strong psychometric properties, supporting its use for assessing death literacy.
  • Analysis included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, confirming a two-factor structure for the Death Literacy Index.
  • Reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.84, indicating good internal consistency for the scale.
  • This culturally adapted index serves as a reliable tool for understanding death literacy in the Turkish population.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt the short form of Death Literacy Index (DLI-9) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. This study has a methodological cross-sectional design. The study was conducted with a sample of 400 adults across Türkiye during October-November. Content Validity Index, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Convergent and Discriminant Validity Analyses, test-retest reliability, Cronbach’s α-coefficient, item-total-score correlation, 27% upper-lower-group item analysis and Hotelling-T 2 test were used in data analysis. In the EFA analysis, the scale consisted of 2 factors. The original two-factor structure of the scale was confirmed by CFA. CFA model fit values were found as CMIN/DF = 2.078, RMSEA = 0.074, RMR = 0.077, SRMR = 0.0455, CFI = 0.960, NFI = 0.927, TLI = 0.945, GFI = 0.946, and AGFI = 0.906. The total Cronbach’s α reliability coefficient of the DLI-9 was found to be 0.84. This study indicates that scale is a reliable tool for evaluating death literacy in the Turkish population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Çakmak et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689522009f4f1c896c428dffhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00302228251366736
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Using multivariate statistics1983 · 77,499 citations
  2. 2Developing death literacy2016 · 195 citations
  3. 3Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 2nd ed.2015 · 1,640 citations
  4. 4Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation2005 · 5,578 citations
  5. 5The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations2006 · 6,864 citations