PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 20250 citationsOpen Access

An assessment of multiple variables predicting the psychological effects of flooding: Case study in Peninsular Malaysia

View Full Paper
SKShabir Ahmad KabirzadBRBalqis Mohamed RehanZZZed Zulkafli

Key Points

  • Main finding highlights that flood durations and family sizes significantly contribute to psychological impacts within households.
  • Data from 217 respondents underscores the variability in psychological effects based on residential and business contexts.
  • The willingness-to-pay method reveals limited support for flood risk reduction among surveyed participants.
  • Findings emphasize the need for enhanced community awareness and shelter facilities to address psychological impacts of flooding.

Abstract

Abstract. Floods are among the most disastrous environmental hazards, causing devastating tangible and intangible impacts. The psychological impact, which can be classified as intangible damage, is an important aspect of human’s well- being. The psychological impact of flooding has begun to receive attention in recent years, but the complexity of measuring it makes it less attractive to be considered in actual flood damage and risk studies. The present study seeks to evaluate the psychological impact of flooding experienced by households and business premises and the different factors that could be the determining variables of the psychological impact. A total of 217 respondents have participated in the empirical face-to-face survey conducted in different vulnerable places in Peninsular Malaysia. Through the willingness-to-pay (WTP) method, only 107 and 34 respondents from residential and business premises, respectively, expressed their agreement to spend on flood risk reduction efforts. The study found that flood durations and family sizes are statistically significant contributors to intangible damages for households, reflecting the intangible damages to residential sector. The results suggest a greater investment to support affected people’s welfare by improving community awareness and shelter facilities. These will enhance risk management efforts and reduce the psychological impacts to people at risk of flooding. The findings also revealed a key challenge: the inability to reliably infer intangible flood damages for business sectors through empirical evidence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kabirzad et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a02afe6551bb0af8cc0adhttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2917
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of multiple predictors to the psychological effects of flooding for residential and business areas in Peninsular Malaysia2026
  2. 2Examining direct and indirect flood damages in residential and business sectors through an empirical lens2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Mitigating the Impact of Floods: A Holistic Management Approach to Prevention2025
  4. 4Exploring predictors of psychological preparedness for flood victims: A conceptual framework for Malaysia2025
  5. 5Does government intervention moderate the flood risk, flood risk perceptions, and moral hazard of Malaysian household risk financing decisions?2026